|
|
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
LMS MIGRATION PROJECTS 11/20/2001 Priority and Rationale Project Title Description/Goal Inter-relationships Resources Required Time Required Functional Unit BIB RECORDS How will 9xx records 9xx prov records 9xx tags aren't MARC; Used by CM, acq & No clue as to All staff creating migrate? Must encl=9 encl=9; catg staff; number and prov. records these be coverted used for EO record original catalogers how long some (CM, RS, Docts, to MARC tags (electronic orders & indicate it takes more have been in Spec Coll, Pres) before migration? other temp. records time to covert to database Beware of records before title is catgd; MARC when data is with mixed prov. & map fields to MARC all caps MARC tags; ask when possible FCLA to rerun mixed tag reports just before migration? These 9xx records QZ records for (AER7119 is QZ test (jt=qz) 232 Monographs, should migrate in orders record); approx. 232 records serials the same manner LUIS records have (jx=qz) 234 as other 9xx titles beginning with records tagged records & QZ followed by the Acq. has no plans name of an associa- to eliminate these tion or … & are used until they see how to pay for multiple a LMS can meet titles from the assoc- the need iation… Priority and Rationale Project Title Description/Goal Inter-relationships Resources Required Time Required Functional Unit FCLA has produced Firm field records See AJS7235 (ltuf), 2450 Monographs and report of firm field with 9xx fields AJZ08558 (ltuf), & CM technical, records containing and vice versa AKN2181 (lthb) with serials, Copy, 9xx fields; valid 909; records for some G&E, CC 9xx fields have been NTIS fiche;serial identified and others retention decision eliminated/retagged fields; monograph Have requested a arrearage fields; report of prov. records AGRICOLA fields (encl=9) contain- ing firm fields; should be available this week ask FCLA to rerun these reports just before migration? Will NOIS/NOIS like NOIS/NOIS like Bib records with DT/1 Misleading display 324 records RS catg, authority records migrat as records with between 9/26/86 in OPAC; challenge between & maintenance they are or do these extra spaces and and 2/16/87 confirm- to process globals aeh0001 & need to be cleaned other punct./ ed; some aeh2029; up before migration? diacritic have 035 field for this is probably 035 (Source) info irregularities in NOIS however the tip of the now indexed in LUIS fixed and variable some appear to have iceberg fields had the NOIS 035 field removed; multiple spaces before and after subfield marks; significant percentage display brackets fixed field values incorrectly; these records should migrate to new LMS Priority and Rationale Project Title Description/Goal Inter-relationships Resources Required Time Required Functional Unit Should these be Template records Templates for LUIS bib (jx=template) RS, Docts/Map, migrated? New records were created 114 records LMS should have to facilitate efficient jt=xxx 550 a mechanism for & accurate input of Delete xxx meeting this need temp. bib records; as initial char- determine which are acters in fields currently used & when record delete others; will these wasn't used be needed in new LMS; for cataloging suppress records in & make which xxx was insert- D/S=S ed as initial characters in field of records not used as catalog record Should these be Test records now Test records were (jt=test record) Systems, FCLA migrated? FCLA in LUIS; created to test 31 records; is working on this created to test system functionality; there are new versions of determine if these probably others NOTIS implemented will be needed in new in the past LMS Will obsolete tags be Obsolete MARC 1st & 2nd indicators in Get estimate CC and CBS validated or loaded info., esp. 1xx fields (add 6xx); as are during migra- indicators in 6xx fields is more tion; which ones can complex; identify & be corrected locally change globally? Priority and Rationale Project Title Description/Goal Inter-relationships Resources Required Time Required Functional Unit Some words are split Diacritics/Special Some diactritics are \cent sign is NOT OK francais= RS, FCLA preventing retrieval; characters translated correctly because this repre- OE= some are displaying and display correctly sents a null char- Others? incorrectly in Web- in WEBLUIS; some acter rather than a Can these be LUIS; Gerald S. will diacritics, such as the legitimate diacritic changed try to have all nulls cedilla and OE globally display as cent; he translated incorrect- will try to have these ly; some words have index as fmt=null; gaps where diacritics FCLA will convert once were and these script l to standard cannot be searched lower case l on bib correctly; some and hldgs; OPS words have had the staff are assisting diacritic(s) removed in identifying & clean- completely; goal ing up problems with should be to have diacritics; FCLA will all words in all lang- include 260 |a in uages be spelled & keyword index displayed accurately in our database FIELDS ON BIBS How will these ??? Question marks in Can these be identified Get #? migrate? As fill fixed fields in & corrected before characters records for migration? sound recordings (and others?) Priority and Rationale Project Title Description/Goal Inter-relationships Resources Required Time Required Functional Unit Not a migration 710s &/or 500s on If not already on Hawaiiana=467 Spec Coll, RS issue? See section records for records, add 710 for Hausenstein=1360 regarding um: notes Special Collections; Hawaiiana, Hausen- MacDonald=1308 in copy holdings Hawaiiana, stein, MacDonald; Goza=826 Hausenstein, add 500 & 710 for Red Barber=402 MacDonald, Goza & Red Barber; Fortune=1720 Autographed, Phek will check with Autograph+=688 UMI Photocopy, P. Malanchuk & UMI Photo.=14 Goza, Fortune, Dan Reboussin for Red Barber Fortune; Jeffrey will modify for Autograph- ed & Tatiana will modify for UMI photocopies How will these records Records coded D/S Some of the bib records Get #? RS be treated? New S for suppressing coded for suppress- LMS should have public display ion from OPAC mechanism for have order records, meeting this need historical info.; deter- mine which must be retained Don't migrate if DT/1 Status D records Status D for delete; is earlier than (bib, mfhl) determine which [set date]? 1996? records can be completely deleted Will these fixed 007 fixed fields with ? Origin; will this be a fields migrate blanks migration problem?; with same value? identify and correct Priority and Rationale Project Title Description/Goal Inter-relationships Resources Required Time Required Functional Unit Not a migration Remarc (OCcLC) Records have an 035 Will eventually conflict FCLA resources ?? FCLA and problem but working 9xxxxxxx field for what appears with valid OCLC to enhance DMU with FCLA to have to be an OCLC numbers. Catalyst's the CATALYST number. (035::|a global capabil- global function (OCcLC)9xxxxxxx); ity in order enhanced to give us these aren't valid for our staff to the capability of OCLC numbers and change the processing these will present a problem 035 (OCcLC) locally when OCLC reaches 9xxxxxx these numbers in numbers to their numbering; try 035::(FU)CARP to have these globally xxxxxxxx identified & changed to 035:: |a (FU)CARP 2001xxxx to avoid conflict with real OCLC #s in the future What 035 information 035 info G&E uses for UF pubs must be migrated? & exhibition catalogs NOT CRITICAL received on exchange; ISSUE info must be migrated 035:: c… Caribbean This information intend- Get # Special Collections code ed to collate titles /LAC; RS about Caribbean area hasn't been consistently applied 035:: (FU) ZYBP Used to track YBP 1996=3,144 Copy Catgg earlier than [set receipts; are the 1997=4.995 date]? older ones needed? 1998=5.074 Priority and Rationale Project Title Description/Goal Inter-relationships Resources Required Time Required Functional Unit This might be more a 043 for series 043 field is defined for (fi no=c) 291 cleanup need than treatment geographic area pulls up class migration ?. Serials code; can this seps Cat has begun creat- information be Several thou- ing 035 fields to bring moved to another sand 043 fields together records field or to authority have been with series treatment control; how can changed to 035 in 043 fields prelim- we identify the records (FU)… inary to moving the on which the 043 field treatment info. from has been used to 043 fields; FCLA record series treatment will produce a report; Several thousand have been changed to 035::(FU)… Should this info be 049 information Information in 049 migrated? field was used for NOT CRITICAL card production, ISSUE for creating item records & for ? determine if this info is still needed in new LMS